Poster presentation: A new approach
This page contains the text of a poster which I have shown on several conferences. It contains the following sections 
Cauchy stress theory at variance with Gauss Divergence Theorem The thermodynamic definition of pressure P = ¶U/¶V (eqn.1) or P = DU/DV in integrated form is an explicit statement of the fundamental requirement of potential theory: in a given state U, the ratio of mass in a system to its potential is scaleindependent. The thermodynamic equilibrium condition is P_{syst} + P_{surr} = 0. Forces are acting on the system from the surrounding, and vice versa; that is: there are two independent groups of forces with opposite sign in the sense that they are directed either inside or outside.
The two groups must balance. Thus the equilibrium condition translates into ò f_{syst} × n dA + ò f_{surr} × n dA = 0, or f_{syst} + f_{surr} = 0 (eqn.2) where f is the source density. The Cauchy theory is based on the assumption that the ratio P = f/A ® const as A ® 0, whereas potential theory holds that the ratio P = U/V ® const as V ® 0. Can both conditions hold together? The source density f in the divergence theorem ò f × n dA = ò Ñ × f dV = f (eqn.3)
is proportional to mass. In a continuum of mass, f is therefore a linear function of the integration limits of the RHS, and Ñ × f = const.
If r = r is the magnitude of the radius of the thermodynamic system, V µ r^{3} and f/r = const. (eqn.4) Thus if V ® 0, f vanishes with r: the ratio f/A ® ¥ as V ® 0, but the ratio U/V = P is constant. The Cauchy stress theory assumes that f/A approaches a finite value as V ® 0. Therefore the Cauchy theory is at variance with the divergence theorem. The Cauchy stress tensor does not exist. The Newtonian definition P = f/A is not not applicable in thermodynamics. The Newtonian definition applies to free planes whereas the divergence theorem and P = U/V consider a closed plane. Free planes divide space into top/bottom, left/right, front/back; only a closed plane divides space into inside/outside. Cauchy's approach to stress never distinguished system and surrounding, it is incompatible with the properties of a thermodynamic system.
Newtonian theory unsuited for continuum mechanics and thermodynamics The basics of continuum mechanics were outlined by Euler in the mid18th century. He adapted the concepts of Newtonian mechanics, the only one available at his time, which was conceived to understand celestial mechanics. Its main tools are
The buildup of an elastic potential is a change of state: work is done on a system. Therefore, its proper theoretical treatment requires an equation of state, not an equation of motion, and work done is related to PdVwork, it is not Newtonian work. None of this is reflected in any way in presentday continuum mechanics where the elastic potential for a volumeconstant deformation is zero by definition. This is wrong by nature. Thus, the theoretical framework of classical continuum mechanics is unsuited to properly deal with the physical reality of an elastic deformation which represents a change of state. Two profoundly different energy conservation laws are thoroughly mixed up. Euler passed on in 1783. In the following year, Lagrange discovered vector fields and founded field theory. The nature of changes of state was only understood in 1842 when the golden age of thermodynamics began. Continuum mechanics, however, the physics of anisotropic changes of state, remained solidly stuck in the philosophy of the 18th century. It is obsolete by 200 years.
A new approach to continuum mechanics A new approach to deformation theory must consider the nature of elastic deformation as a change of state. Thus an equation of state is required. 1. Solids have a much smaller molar volume than gases because of internal bonds. Thus they are said to have an internal pressure. An increase in external pressure must therefore be scaled to the internal pressure of the solid. An equation of state is proposed P^{k}V = z (eqn.5a) where k = ln V_{mol}^{solid}/ ln V_{mol}^{ideal gas} (eqn.5b) and z is solved by the BirchMurnaghan equation. Eqn.5 is material independent. For real materials, k is readily calculated; for modelling purposes it suffices to continue with the ideal gas law. The approach taken here is similar to that of Grüneisen 1908 (see historical paper).
Bridgman PW (1958) The physics of high pressure. Bell & Sons Ltd, London
2. Boyle's law is written in scalar terms; it must be transformed into vector form: PV = const ® fr = const (eqn.6) where r = r is the radius of the thermodynamic system, and f = f is the force acting on the system surface (either f_{syst} from within, or f_{surr} from without). 3. Equilibrium can always be assumed to exist in the elastic state because system and surrounding are physically connected through chemical bonds in the solid; these bonding forces need to be taken into account. Disequilibrium is therefore impossible. 4. Both f_{syst} and f_{surr} are understood as classical force fields which are derived from potentials (E = material enthalpy, U = some externally controlled potential): f_{syst} = e_{i}¶E_{syst}/¶x_{i} f_{surr} = e_{i}¶U_{surr}/¶x_{i} (eqn.7) with the field property tensors ¶^{2}E/¶x^{2} = F_{syst} ¶^{2}U/¶x^{2} = F_{surr} (eqn.8) such that f = ò Fdr, or simply Fr = f. F_{surr} is the field property tensor for the external force field, it represents the boundary conditions. F_{syst} represents the material properties. The two independent fields are then related to one another by means of the equilibrium condition. The result is the stress field. 5. Once the stress field is derived, the equation of state will provide the displacement field: just as PV = const translates into ln (V_{1}/V_{0}) =  DP/P_{0}, the equation of state in vector form yields fr = const ® ln (r_{1}/r_{0}) =  Df/f_{0} (eqn.9) Thus, stress is treated as an anisotropic change of state. Stress field and displacement field have exactly identical geometric properties as a function of two independent sets of boundary conditions: the externally controlled set and the material properties.
Results (1) The eigendirections (stable directions) of the simple shear stress/displacement field are nonorthogonal. They are correlated with the observed fabric elements:
The figure shows the predicted properties of a dextral simple shear. These theoretically derived results compare very favorably with natural fabrics.

Left panel: field data from a mylonite (Spessart Mtns, data: K.Weber). Right panel: predicted fabric orientations. The predicted and observed diagrams are virtually identical, with the exception of the (quartz) grain shape foliation. However, quartz grain boundaries are highly mobile and never reflect the crystal anisotropy. The theory would expect a genetic relation between the extending eigendirection e and e.g., the (001)plane of mica or the long axes of plag porphyroclasts; their orientation exactly agrees with e.
The theory predicts that the main anisotropy direction of a crystal will find a final orientation parallel to the extending eigendirection e. Crystals can undergo internal dislocation glide only while they rotate externally. Once they reach the maximum, the crystals are in a locked position; that is, dislocation flow alone cannot possibly lead to largescale deformation. Heterogeneous deformation mechanisms are required.
Schematic SCfabric in a metamorphic shear zone, dextral shear.
SCfabric in a lower greenschist facies mylonite, dextral shear. Note dextral offset and discontinuities of color banding across Cplanes (red). Slayering outlined by color banding gently rotated against overall sense of shear between Cplanes. Yellow: macroscopic foliation. Insubric Line/Sesia Zone, Val Strona, Italy.
Roughly developed SC fabric in a fault near the brittleplastic transition, dextral shear. Black: shear zone boundaries; blue: compositional layering and local foliation, Splane; red: discontinuities, Cplane. Rhode Island, USA.
Simple shear in a subrecent obsidian flow. Upper layer consisting of black glass contains abundant bubbles; lower layer (reddishtan) partly crystallized. Upper layer developed viscous drag, lower layer developed cracks. Both drag and orientation of cracks indicate dextral shear. Crack orientation correlates with contracting eigendirection c in panel above. Lipari Island, Italy.
Results (2) The theory predicts that
The strong energetic differences as a function of deformation type are in close agreement with experimental results (Franssen & Spiers 1990). Franssen RCMW & Spiers CJ (1990) Deformation of polycrystalline salt in compression and in shear at 250350°C. Geol Soc London Special Paper 54, 201213
In this figure the predicted simple shear energy is scaled to the pure shear energy = 100%.
Results (3) 3Dmodel calculations suggest that an elastic plane strain deformation consists of an isotropic contraction (one contracting step in all directions), and an anisotropic expansion such that there is
The net stretch parallel to Y is zero; but what matters is the anisotropic part since the isotropic component does not have eigendirections. Thus if the material yields, no single crack can resolve the entire stored elastic potential at once. Instead, two failures are required; they have similar probability, but are conjugate to one another.
View on the XYplane from above (along Z). (Left) Midgreen: undeformed sphere; dark green: isotropic contraction; light green: final shape due to anisotropic stretch // X (vertical) and // Y (horizontal). (Right) Stretch components only. Two metastable least energy stretch directions (red arrows) are conjugate to one another which become phenomenologically existent if the elastic state of loading is relaxed by irreversible processes, resulting in conjugate joints (blue lines) An irreversible relaxation results at least in momentary disequilibrium. The balanced system decays into two subsystems with opposite unbalanced rotational momentum about the contracting eigendirection (about Z). Thus linear structures parallel to Y are metastable.
In rocks the stress decay instability is also responsible for the occurrence of conjugate structures (e.g. joints). Even SCfabric is commonly developed in conjugate sets if viewed from above (i.e. on the XYplane, the main foliation), resulting at mesoscale in a characteristic rhomboid pattern if moderately developed, and in "oyster shell" structure in advanced state.
Results (4) The theory predicts that only perfectly isotropic materials undergoing plane pure shear or axial deformation will undergo volumeneutral deformation. Simple shear and/or anisotropic material properties will result in a volume increase/density decrease. This phenomenon  expansion upon anisotropic loading, especially with regard to anisotropic materials  is known as dilatancy (Reynolds 1885). Contrary to the classical view which interprets dilatancy as a material property, it is here predicted as a function of the setup. Reynolds O (1885) On the dilatancy of media imposed of rigid particles in contact. Phil Mag 20, 1886, 469481

Origin of elasticreversible volume increase upon loading (dilatancy). (Top) The ideal reversible process is the one that requires the most work. Hence it is assumed that the ideal change of state is an isotropic contraction.
(Middle) In anisotropic loading the existence of shear forces will cause a dilatancy. For plane pure shear conditions the calculated dilatancy will exactly balance the calculated volume decrease that would be observed if the change of state were ideal, i.e. there is zero volume change.
(Bottom) For plane simple shear conditions the dilatancy caused by shear forces will exceed the isotropic volume decrease connected with a respective ideal change of state: a real dilatance is thus predicted. (It is also observed.)

Results (5) Fourier series approach to stress distribution in discrete bodies From its mathematical properties, the new approach is a classical field theory. It is thus possible to apply standard Fourier series methods to calculate stress distributions in bodies with a given shape. In the figures below, the stress distribution in a block of 10 units width and 30 units height is shown. The block is loaded vertically, the lateral faces are free faces. (The graphs were calculated using MapleVsoftware, and then recontoured to reduce memory volume.)
(Left) Potential for dilational cracking concentrated in center of body along the median, reaching zero along the free surfaces, and negative values along loaded faces at top and bottom. Physical interpretation: a crack is most likely to originate in the center of the body; it will be a dilational crack, and propagate vertically along the median line towards top and bottom. Near the loaded faces it will bifurcate, and propagate as shear cracks towards the corners.
Results (6) The orientation of the maximum compressive stress direction along the San Andreas Fault (SAF) in California has been the subject of much debate because its angle to the fault is far higher (ca.80°) than predicted by the theory currently in use (near 45°). For a presentation of the current difficulties in the understanding of the SAF see Zoback (2000), Nature 405, pp.3132. Presently a drilling program is under way to sample the SAF at the depth at which the quakes occur (see Zoback's website). I believe that there is no problem with the SAF, but with the theory.
Maximum compressive stress orientations (blue) along a section of the San Andreas Fault (red). SF: San Francisco, SLO: San Louis Obispo, SB: Santa Barbara. Black outlines: coastline, and outline of Great Valley. Compare stress orientation with contracting eigendirection c in the figures above. Data from Zoback et al. (1987) Science 238, pp.11051111 A comparison of Zoback's data and the stress orientation for simple shear (such as transform faults) predicted by my approach is offered here on a onepage WinWord file. front page back to the top
